All Aboard the Party Temple
Pages
Likes
-
Tumblr Crushes:
-
“
In mythologies where mermaids do get to walk, the cure is often framed as a tragedy because it’s...
” -
David Gandy shows some skin for Dolce & Gabbana’s GYM collection 2012. New on David’s page in...
-
Adventures in actually hearing what I'm doing
Yesterday my came-with-the-system Xbox headset...
-
Scent of a Warden
ALSO! I came back to my wee package of Mass Effect perfumes.
Oh my God, you...
Following
-
neairaalenko replied to your post: serah-bex replied to your post: neairaalenko…Please, there’s nothing remotely weird about a grown ass man falling in love with an infant as long as he promises to hold off on acting out on his ~feelings~ until she’s physically mature!
Right?
Like I said, I’ve seen it many times as a trope in fantasy or romance novels, but always between two adults. When you throw in a situation where the bonding or “imprinting” (and what the hell, is he a baby duck? a baby chicken? some sort of fowl?) is between two parties that are not morally or legally allowed to be together…
IT’S JUST WEIRD.
I really think it was added as a plot device because she backed herself into a corner. Maybe not? I haven’t read the books, so maybe it’s explained better in them. But it sure seems like that’s the reason for its inclusion. Because…I mean, who would include that otherwise?
Ugh ugh ugh.
-
-
signcherie said:
I think it served two purposes. One, to resolve the Edward/Bella/Jacob love triangle so that Bella can have her “happily ever after” without guilt over Jake, and two, to avoid a fight scene, because SM didn’t know how to write them. My opinion.
-
freckles04 posted this
-